J. David Golub - Page 36




                                        - 36 -                                         

          present legitimate cases.  Petitioner has also caused needless               
          expense and wasted resources for respondent, respondent’s                    
          counsel, the proposed witness, and this Court.  We do not, and               
          should not, countenance the use of this Court as a vehicle for a             
          disgruntled litigant to proclaim the alleged wrongdoing of                   
          others, especially when that litigant has refused to obey an                 
          appropriate court’s order to arbitrate his grievances.                       
               In this case, petitioner received substantial amounts of                
          income in 1991, but he failed to pay income taxes on those                   
          amounts.  His defense to that failure is frivolous and wholly                
          without merit.  We will require petitioner to pay a $10,000                  
          penalty under section 6673(a).                                               
               Petitioner has advanced many other arguments in his                     
          submissions to this Court.  They appear to be variations of the              
          contentions we have addressed herein.  We have considered all                
          those arguments, and, to the extent not specifically addressed               
          herein, we find them to be without merit.                                    
               In view of the foregoing,                                               
                                                   Decision will be entered            
                                              under Rule 155.                          












Page:  Previous  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  

Last modified: May 25, 2011