F. Browne Gregg, Sr., and Juanita O. Gregg - Page 13




                                        - 13 -                                         
          however, that under Florida law the award of prejudgment interest            
          on petitioner’s fraud claim supports the conclusion that                     
          petitioner did not receive the compensatory damages on account of            
          personal injuries.  Under Florida law, prejudgment interest is               
          ordinarily not recoverable for personal injury actions, because              
          “the amount and the measure of damages is largely discretionary              
          with the jury and is in consequence unliquidated until the                   
          trial”.  Farrelly v. Heuacker, 159 So. 24, 25 (Fla. 1935); see               
          also Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212, 214              
          n.1 (Fla. 1985); Zorn v. Britton, 162 So. 879 (Fla. 1935).5  For             
          similar reasons, prejudgment interest is ordinarily not available            
          as a remedy for an action in tort under Florida law, although                
          prejudgment interest may be awarded where there is an                        
          ascertainable out-of-pocket loss as the result of the loss of                

               4(...continued)                                                         
               in explaining what constitutes damage sufficient to                     
               warrant actionable fraud * * *.  Early cases reflect a                  
               requirement that the injury sustained must ordinarily                   
               be pecuniary in nature.  Other Florida decisions seem                   
               to align themselves with the general rule * * * [that]                  
               Damage need not be subject to accurate measurement in                   
               money, but may result from the fact that the defrauded                  
               party has been induced to incur legal liabilities or                    
               obligations different from those represented or                         
               contracted for. * * * [Citations omitted.]                              

               5 Under Florida law, a personal injury plaintiff may be                 
          entitled to prejudgment interest on medical expenses, but only               
          when the plaintiff shows that he has made actual out-of-pocket               
          payments for those expenses prior to judgment.  Alvarado v. Rice,            
          614 So. 2d 498, 500 (Fla. 1993).  However, this exception to the             
          general rule applies because such a plaintiff suffers the loss of            
          a vested property right; namely the loss of use of his money.                
          Id.  In any event, petitioner has not alleged physical harm, and             
          the record is devoid of any evidence of any medical expenses that            
          he incurred.                                                                 

Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011