Estate of James Waldo Hendrickson - Page 32




                                        - 32 -                                         
          (30 percent), and (3) price/book multiple (40 percent).  After               
          computing the weighted average value of total equity on a                    
          minority basis, HSC applied a 30-percent marketability discount,             
          and divided the result by 3,000, the total number of shares of               
          Peoples common stock outstanding, to determine the fair market               
          value of the estate shares on a per share basis.  Petitioner did             
          not use HSC as an expert witness in this case.                               
               On July 25, 1997, respondent timely mailed petitioner a                 
          notice of deficiency with respect to its estate tax liability.               
          The notice of deficiency determined a value of $8,938,91214 for              
          the estate shares, based upon an appraisal prepared by David F.              
          Fuller of Business Valuation Services, Inc., who acted as                    
          respondent's expert witness in this case.                                    
          H.   Lack of Marketability                                                   
               On the valuation date:  (1) Peoples had few opportunities               
          for growth; (2) Peoples' earnings were subject to significant                
          interest rate risk; (3) Peoples had no employee stock option plan            
          or history of repurchasing shares; and (4) there was no readily              
          available public or private market for Peoples stock.  Each of               
          these conditions contributed to a lack of marketability of                   
          Peoples stock.                                                               


            14 The redetermined value of the estate shares in the notice               
            of deficiency and the amount asserted at trial by respondent               
            are essentially the same; they differ only because                         
            respondent's expert rounded certain figures in his report.                 
            See discussion infra of respondent's expert.                               




Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011