Estate of Ona E. Hendrickson - Page 74





                                        - 74 -                                         

          decedent’s right of subrogation, held proper where decedent                  
          guaranteed secured debt; property securing debt was distributed              
          to decedent's son (the primary debtor) by the estate, subject to             
          the mortgage; and the giving of the guaranty was not a gift).                
          III. Unused Exclusions Available as Conceded in Respondent's                 
                Brief; Offset and Deduction for Gift Taxes Payable                     
               Respondent admits that decedent's gifts of farm land during             
          1979-93 did not consume all of decedent's annual gift tax                    
          exclusions for gifts to the children.  Accordingly, on brief                 
          respondent has conceded that in determining the taxable gifts                
          made by decedent, the amounts of unused exclusion shown in the               
          table in our findings of fact, see supra pp. 10-11, should be                
          taken into account.                                                          
               By contrast, petitioner contends that the exclusions                    
          available should be twice the amounts shown in the table.                    
          Petitioner apparently believes that if any additional gifts were             
          made by decedent, they were made to six donees (presumably, to               
          the children and their spouses) rather than to three.                        
               Petitioner has offered no evidence that decedent intended to            
          give anything other than the family farm land to the children's              
          spouses.  Moreover, the assertion that the investment income at              
          issue herein was transferred to anyone other than the children is            
          totally inconsistent with petitioner's primary argument, which is            
          that all amounts at issue were consumed by a bona fide business              






Page:  Previous  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011