Investment Research Associates - Page 515




                                       - 559 -                                         
               To be entitled to a bad debt deduction under section 166,               
          the taxpayer, among other things, must establish that a genuine              
          debt in fact existed, and that the debt became worthless within              
          that taxable year.  See Andrew v. Commissioner, 54 T.C. 239, 245             
          (1970); sec. 1.166-1(c), Income Tax Regs.                                    
               In deciding whether a debt has become worthless, we consider            
          whether a creditor in the exercise of sound business judgment                
          would conclude that the debt is uncollectible.  See Andrew v.                
          Commissioner, supra at 248.  Thus, whether a debt has become                 
          worthless in a particular year is a question of fact.  However,              
          the resolution of such issue is based on objective factors and               
          not merely on the taxpayer's subjective judgment as to                       
          worthlessness.  See generally sec. 1.166-2(a), Income Tax Regs.              
               IRA again argues that certain statements made by                        
          respondent's counsel at trial were "concessions", and that the               
          only issue to be decided was whether the debts were worthless in             
          1987 when they were written off.  Respondent, on the other hand,             
          contends that IRA failed to establish that (1) Ballard's and                 
          Lisle's debts became worthless during 1987; (2) the Abernathy                
          debt (a) had any value prior to 1987, and (b) became worthless               
          during 1987; and (3) the Forest limited partnership debt (a)                 
          existed in fact, and (b) became worthless during 1987.                       
               We agree with respondent.  First, we reject IRA's concession            
          argument.  It has no merit.                                                  






Page:  Previous  549  550  551  552  553  554  555  556  557  558  559  560  561  562  563  564  565  566  567  568  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011