Daniel Francis Kelly, Jr. - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         

               Petitioner contends that the disallowed legal expenses were            
          incurred by him while he was engaged in the course and scope of             
          his employment with GBC, and, thus, such expenses are deductible            
          as ordinary and necessary business expenses under section 162(a).           
          Respondent argues, on the other hand, that the disallowed legal             
          expenses were personal expenses of petitioner that are not                  
          deductible pursuant to section 262.                                         
               Expenses incurred by an employee in the course of employment           
          that are not reimbursed by the employer may be deductible under             
          section 162(a), which allows a deduction for all ordinary and               
          necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in              
          carrying on a trade or business.5  Primuth v. Commissioner, 54              
          T.C. 374, 377 (1970).  To qualify for the deduction, an expense             
          must be both ordinary and necessary within the meaning of section           
          162(a).  Deputy v. duPont, 308 U.S. 488, 495 (1940).  Whether an            
          amount claimed constitutes an ordinary and necessary expense as             
          an employee business expense is a question of fact to be                    


          5                                                                           
               Petitioner's Federal income tax returns for 1991 and 1992              
          included a Schedule C for a "Financial Services" activity.  This            
          activity, while not addressed at trial, was apparently unrelated            
          to petitioner's employment with GBC.  Petitioner was paid a                 
          salary by GBC, which he reported on his income tax returns as               
          salary or wage income.  The sexual assault matter was not claimed           
          by petitioner to have arisen out of petitioner's Schedule C                 
          financial services activity; nevertheless, petitioner's expenses            
          for the defense of the sexual assault charge were claimed as                
          Schedule C deductions.  As was noted by counsel for respondent at           
          trial, if petitioner is allowed a deduction for the legal                   
          expenses at issue, such expenses would constitute unreimbursed              
          employee business expenses and would be deductible as itemized              
          deductions, subject to the 2-percent limitation of sec. 67(a).              
          Petitioner did not challenge this assertion.                                

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011