- 14 - Leaving aside whether petitioner's initial act in procuring the room was primarily for his personal purposes, the Court is satisfied from the record that petitioner's second trip to the hotel room, at which time a sexual offense purportedly occurred, was the action that gave rise to the sexual assault claim, and such action was driven primarily by petitioner's personal motives. The Court so finds. At this second visit, petitioner and Ms. Doe were admittedly alone in the room. If petitioner made this second visit out of his concern for Ms. Doe, he did not indicate that he would do so to Ms. Johnson, whom he had just dropped off at the Sports Bar. On the contrary, petitioner stated to Ms. Johnson that he was going home. Moreover, while in the room, petitioner admitted to contacts between him and Ms. Doe that were clearly well beyond the realm of ascertaining Ms. Doe's well-being and clearly unrelated to petitioner's trade or business. GBC's elevator policy in effect at the time of the incident, with which petitioner contends he was complying, stated as follows: I. OBSERVANCE OF INTOXICATION A. Previous intoxication 1. Personnel are directed to closely observe all patrons at any Pointe bar. 2. Insure that our bartenders are not serving alcoholic beverages to already intoxicated individualsPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011