Henry F. K. Kersting - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         

               Petitioner was a promoter and manager of investment plans              
          designed to create interest deductions for plan participants.1              
          Petitioner has not filed a tax return since 1975.  In January               
          1981, special agents of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS),                 
          Criminal Investigation Division, executed a warrant to search               
          petitioner's corporate offices.  Among the documents seized were            
          lists of participants in the tax shelter programs.  Audits of               
          these participants resulted in the filing in this Court of                  
          approximately 1,800 petitions.  In 1989, 14 dockets involving               
          eight petitioners with similar adjustments were selected as test            
          cases, consolidated for purposes of trial, briefing, and opinion,           
          and set for trial under the name Dixon v. Commissioner.  The                
          issue in Dixon was whether the interest deductions generated by             
          the Kersting investment plans were allowable.                               
               While the Dixon taxpayers were awaiting trial, the IRS on              
          May 15, 1987, petitioned the U. S. District Court for the                   
          District of Hawaii (District Court) for leave to serve a John Doe           
          summons on petitioner.  In its petition, the IRS alleged that               
          petitioner was promoting tax shelters of questionable validity              




               1 See Dixon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-614, vacated              
          and remanded sub nom. DuFresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 105 (9th            
          Cir. 1994), reinstated sub. nom. Dixon v. Commissioner, T.C.                
          Memo. 1999-101, for a detailed analysis of petitioner's                     
          investment operations.                                                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011