- 6 - to judgment, and it brought a separate action to reduce the section 6700 penalties to judgment (Kersting II, Civ. No. 92- 00593 HMF). The 33 corporations involved in the investment plans brought a wrongful levy action pursuant to section 7426 seeking various remedies (Pacific Paradise, Civ. No. 91-00747 HMF). The three cases were consolidated and are hereinafter referred to as Kersting (Consolidated Cases). The Dixon taxpayers tried their cases before this Court in January 1989. In Dixon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-614, the Court sustained virtually all of the Commissioner's determinations in each of the test cases. However, the Court's decisions in Dixon were vacated and remanded sub nom. DuFresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d 105 (9th Cir. 1994), with directions to conduct an evidentiary hearing to consider the effect of the Commissioner's admission, subsequent to the trial and entry of decisions, that there had been secret settlements with two of the Dixon test case taxpayers. Following an extensive evidentiary hearing and in a lengthy opinion, the Tax Court reinstated the decisions in Dixon determining deficiencies in the income of the taxpayers. See Dixon v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-101. Kersting (Consolidated Cases) was tried in the District Court before Judge Harold M. Fong in a nonjury trial commencing May 10, 1994, and concluding June 17, 1994. During the course of the trial, the District Court considered and denied a number ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011