The Limited, Inc. - Page 32




                                       - 32 -                                         
          do not satisfy it.  WFNNB's articles of association significantly           
          limit its banking activities:                                               
               The association                                                        
              (i)  will engage only in credit card operations;                       
               (ii)  will not accept demand deposits or deposits that                 
               the depositor may withdraw by check or similar                         
               means for payment to third parties or others;                          
          (iii)  will not accept any savings or time deposit of less                  
                    than $100,000;                                                    
               (iv)  will maintain no more than one office that accepts               
                    deposits;                                                         
               (v)  will not engage in the business of making commercial              
               loans; * * *                                                           
               WFNNB is a special purpose institution that is not of much             
          use to a foreign business customer seeking banking services                 
          except as the issuer of a private-label credit card or as the               
          recipient of large deposits of funds that are not needed                    
          immediately.  Those are insufficient services for us to conclude            
          that WFNNB was “carrying on the banking business” as Congress               
          used that phrase in section 956(b)(2)(A).                                   
                    2.  Dividend Equivalence                                          
               As originally enacted, in 1962, the repatriation provision             
          classified as U.S. property virtually all investments by a                  
          controlled foreign corporation of its earnings in the United                
          States.  There was little, if any, reason for Congress to include           
          a related-party restriction in the exception for section 956                
          deposits.11  By 1976, however, the tax writing committees of                


          11   From the enactment of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956             
          (BHCA), Pub. L. 91-607, ch. 240, 70 Stat. 133, currently codified           
          at 12 U.S.C. secs. 1841-1850 (1994), until its amendment by the             
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011