The Limited, Inc. - Page 37




                                       - 37 -                                         
          creating, organizing, or funding MFE N.V. was to avoid the                  
          application of section 956 with respect to MFE.                             
               Petitioner argues that the purpose of organizing MFE N.V.              
          was to inject an additional corporate layer between MFE and the             
          deposits to WFNNB “to improve the efficacy of the deposits as               
          protection against expropriation” by the People’s Republic of               
          China, which was scheduled to take over Hong Kong in 1997.  That            
          was the testimony of Kenneth B. Gilman, petitioner’s executive              
          vice president-finance and chief financial officer.  When asked,            
          however, why that was the case, Mr. Gilman replied that he was              
          not exactly sure.  Timothy B. Lyons is and, during the years in             
          issue, was petitioner’s vice president-tax.  His responsibilities           
          include compliance, tax planning, and administration of the tax             
          function at petitioner.  He is intimately familiar with the                 
          business activity of MFE.  Like Mr. Gilman, he also testified               
          that the purpose of forming MFE N.V. was to protect against                 
          expropriation.  Indeed, he testified that it was the “sole”                 
          purpose for organizing MFE N.V.  On cross-examination, Mr. Lyon             
          was asked why no consideration had been given to forming a                  
          domestic (United States) subsidiary of MFE to protect against               
          expropriation.  He responded:  “It didn’t really accomplish                 
          anything from the asset protection side * * * but * * * there is            
          no question it would have been deemed a dividend or something at            








Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011