Pizza Industries, Inc., Domino's Pizza - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         


          before issuing a notice of deficiency.                                      
               Respondent claims that it was petitioner's burden to prove             
          that it was entitled to the deduction.  However, petitioner                 
          provided respondent with copies of the agreements at issue.                 
          Respondent's determination was simply based on respondent's                 
          interpretation of those agreements.  At the time, respondent's              
          theory for disallowing the deduction was not completely clear,              
          and hence petitioner could do nothing further to substantiate the           
          claimed deduction.                                                          
               In light of the foregoing, respondent has failed to                    
          establish that respondent's position in the administrative and              
          court proceedings was substantially justified.                              
               To reflect our disposition of the disputed issues and the              
          parties' concessions,                                                       


                                                  An appropriate order and            
                                             decision will be entered.                
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  

Last modified: May 25, 2011