Estate of Richard R. Simplot - Page 30




                                       - 30 -                                         

          is defined as "the price at which the property would change hands           
          between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under           
          any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable                 
          knowledge of relevant facts."  United States v. Cartwright, 411             
          U.S. 546, 550 (1973); Collins v. Commissioner, 3 F.3d 625, 633 (2d          
          Cir. 1993), affg. T.C. Memo. 1992-478; sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate            
          Tax Regs.  The standard is objective, using a purely hypothetical           
          willing buyer and willing seller, each of whom would seek to                
          maximize his or her profit from any transaction involving the               
          property.   See Estate of Watts v. Commissioner, 823 F.2d 483, 486          
          (11th Cir. 1987), affg. T.C. Memo. 1985-595; Propstra v. United             
          States, 680 F.2d 1248, 1251-1252 (9th Cir. 1982); Estate of Bright          
          v. United States, 658 F.2d 999, 1005-1006 (5th Cir. 1981).  The             
          hypothetical persons are not specific individuals or entities, and          
          their characteristics are not necessarily the same as the personal          
          characteristics of the actual seller or a particular buyer. See             
          Propstra v. United States, supra; Estate of Newhouse v.                     
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 193, 218 (1990); Kolom v. Commissioner, 71            
          T.C. 235, 244 (1978), affd. 644 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir. 1981).                  
          However, the hypothetical sale should not be constructed in a               
          vacuum isolated from the actual facts that affect value. See                
          Estate of Andrews v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 938, 956 (1982).                 
               Valuation of property for tax purposes is a question of fact;          
          all facts and circumstances are to be examined on the date of               
          valuation without regard to hindsight.  See, e.g., Hamm v.                  
          Commissioner, 325 F.2d 934, 938 (8th Cir. 1963), affg. T.C. Memo.           

Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011