Estate of Helen J. Smith, Deceased, Frederic L. Foill II and Cassandra F. Vallery, Co-Executors - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          was close to or equal to zero, indicating to Mr. Egan that the              
          companies he chose were valued, for the most part, on the basis             
          of assets rather than on the basis of earnings, cash-flow, or               
          dividends.  Considering all relevant factors, Mr. Egan believed             
          that decedent’s shares of stock in JFI would sell at a discount             
          from net asset value less than the discount for the comparable              
          companies, so he chose a discount of 50 percent.  Thus, for his             
          final step, Mr. Egan applied the discount of 50 percent to a                
          figure for net asset value for JFI of $1,063,610, for an asset-             
          based value of $532,000.                                                    
                    Earnings Value                                                    
               Mr. Egan’s approach was to calculate the present value of              
          JFI’s future earnings stream by developing an estimate of future            
          earnings, to which he applied a capitalization rate in order to             
          discount future earnings back to present value.  The                        
          capitalization rate employed was equal to the rate of return                
          that, in Mr. Egan’s opinion, an investor would require before               
          deciding to invest in JFI.1                                                 
               To estimate the future earnings of JFI, Mr. Egan began with            
          average annual earnings of JFI for the 5 years previous to 1993             
          in the amount of $18,111.  He also calculated a 5-year weighted             



               1 In general, the inherent risk in an investment is directly           
          proportional to the required rate of return from the investment.            
          Thus, the riskier the investment, the higher the rate of return             
          required by the investor.                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011