Abraham and Dina Weiss - Page 23




                                       - 23 -                                         

          (quoting Grunwald v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 85, 89 (1986))), affd.           
          without published opinion 40 F.3d 385 (5th Cir. 1994).6                     
          Addition to Tax and Increased Interest                                      
               Section 6653(a) imposes additions to tax where the taxpayer            
          has acted negligently or with intentional disregard of rules and            
          regulations.  Petitioners bear the burden of proof on this issue.           
          Rule 142(a); Bixby v. Commissioner, 58 T.C. 757, 791-792 (1972).            
               Petitioner Abraham Weiss is a certified public accountant              
          who has testified to substantial experience in preparing tax                
          returns.  If there were convincing evidence available that                  
          petitioners neither negligently nor intentionally disregarded the           
          applicable rules and regulations, Mr. Weiss, as an accountant,              
          plainly knew the importance of producing it.  Petitioners failed            
          to adduce such evidence.  We accordingly hold that they                     
          intentionally or negligently failed to follow rules and                     
          regulations and that they are chargeable with the addition to tax           
          under section 6653(a).                                                      
               Section 6621(c) (formerly section 6621(d)) provides for an             
          increase in the interest rate where there is a substantial                  
          underpayment (i.e., one that exceeds $1,000) in any taxable year            


               6 The petition claims that the delay in sending the notice             
          of deficiency is respondent's fault, and it asserts that interest           
          that has accrued on the deficiencies should be abated pursuant to           
          sec. 6404(e).  Consideration of petitioners’ request for                    
          abatement of interest is premature, however, as there has been              
          neither an assessment of interest nor a final determination by              
          respondent not to abate the interest.  See sec. 6404(e), (g), as            
          currently in effect; see also Bourekis v. Commissioner, 110 T.C.            
          20, 26 (1998).                                                              

Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011