Daniela Aldea - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         
               Respondent concedes that petitioner is entitled to a                   
          deduction of $2,465 for job-seeking expense based on the 8,216              
          miles driven by petitioner between her home in Yuba City and the            
          union hall in Sacramento during periods when petitioner was                 
          engaged in job hunting.  The parties agree that petitioner is               
          entitled to additional itemized deductions of $130 for education            
          expenses, $281 for safety equipment, $1,171.13 for union dues,              
          and $166 for work tools.  Petitioner concedes that she is not               
          entitled to a deduction for uniforms and cleaning.  Thus, the               
          only remaining issues regarding petitioner’s itemized deductions            
          are whether she is entitled to a deduction of $1,160 for                    
          charitable contributions and whether she is entitled to a                   
          deduction of $4,293 for miles she claims she drove to and from              
          temporary work assignments.                                                 
               With regard to petitioner’s loss from Amway activity                   
          reported on Schedule C, petitioner has conceded that she is not             
          entitled to deductions for seminar expenses beyond the $20                  
          allowed by respondent.  The only remaining issue concerning                 
          petitioner’s Schedule C deductions is whether petitioner is                 
          entitled to $809 of the vehicle expenses she claimed.                       
                                     Discussion                                       
               Deductions are strictly a matter of legislative grace, and             
          taxpayers must satisfy the specific requirements for any                    
          deduction claimed.  See INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S.             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011