William Joel Ashley - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          herein by this reference.  At the time he filed his petition,               
          petitioner resided in Los Angeles, California.                              
          I.   Residential Real Property                                              
               On March 29, 1985, petitioner purchased residential real               
          property located at 127 N. 31st Avenue, Longport, New Jersey                
          (Longport property), for $106,000.  Petitioner, however, did not            
          reside at the Longport property.  In 1985, petitioner expended              
          significant amounts in renovating the property.  During and                 
          subsequent to 1985, petitioner purchased furniture, appliances,             
          and various household items for the purpose of renting the                  
          Longport property primarily as a summer vacation home.  On                  
          September 30, 1994, petitioner sold the property for $216,000.              
               A.  Gain or Loss on Disposition of Property                            
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent asserted that the              
          entire $216,000 generated from the Longport property was subject            
          to tax.2  Subsequent to the issuance of the notice of deficiency,           
          in June of 1999, petitioner filed a tax return for 1994 with the            
          Internal Revenue Service Center in Fresno, California.  Using               
          Form 4797, Sales of Business Property, petitioner claimed a                 
          $140,000 ordinary loss on the 1994 tax return with regard to the            
          Longport property.                                                          
               In exhibits submitted to the Court, petitioner now claims              


               2  Respondent now concedes that petitioner is entitled to an           
          offset of $106,000 (subject to depreciation) for the initial                
          investment in the Longport property.                                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011