- 2 - amounts of $593,967, $13,064,705 and $36,102,409, respectively. In relevant part, respondent determined that petitioner could not accrue a deduction of its estimated lifetime warranty expenses, or a part thereof, for vehicles that were sold during the corresponding year. We must decide whether for Federal income tax purposes all events necessary to determine petitioner’s liability for its warranty expenses have occurred when it sells its vehicles to its dealers; in other words, has petitioner satisfied the first prong of the all events test entitling it to deduct its estimated future warranty costs on the sale of such vehicles? We hold that it has not. The following statement of the background of this case is based on the parties’ joint statement of undisputed and disputed facts, stipulation of facts--warranty issue, and attached exhibits. Background Petitioner’s principal place of business was located in Auburn Hills, Michigan, when the petition was filed. Petitioner keeps its books and computes its income for financial purposes and for Federal income tax purposes using the accrual method of accounting. It uses a calendar year as its taxable year. Petitioner manufactures and sells automobiles and trucks (vehicles). Petitioner generally sells the manufactured vehicles to dealers, who resell the vehicles to retail customers. A salePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011