- 9 - liability.” Respondent bears the burden of proving his entitlement to a partial summary judgment. See Rule 121(b); Jacklin v. Commissioner, 79 T.C. 340, 344 (1982). The factual materials presented and the inferences therefrom must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. See Adickes v. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 (1962). Petitioner argues respondent has not provided either evidence or explanation that shows petitioner’s statutory warranty liabilities are not fixed by statutes, such as the U.C.C., Magnuson-Moss, and State “lemon laws”. Petitioner places reliance on United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc., 476 U.S. 593 (1986), for the proposition that statutory liabilities satisfy the first prong of the all events test. Petitioner states: “It is well settled that if a liability is fixed by statute, it is fixed under the first prong of the All Events Test.”3 We find petitioner’s reliance on United States v. Hughes Properties, Inc., supra, and other cases4 cited to be 3Petitioner uses the term “statutory liability” to refer to liabilities arising from statutes or regulations promulgated pursuant to a statute. 4Petitioner also cites: United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422 (1926) (involved a statutory liability that arose upon the profitable sale of munitions); Kaiser Steel Corp. v. United States, 717 F.2d 1304 (9th Cir. 1983); Wien Consol. Airlines, Inc. v. Commissioner, 528 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1976), affg. 60 T.C. 13 (1973); Denise Coal Co. v. Commissioner, 271 F.2d 930 (3d Cir. 1959), revg. 29 T.C. 528 (1957); Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 293 (2000) (a portion of the liability fixed by State regulations met the first prong); Ohio River (continued...)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011