Daniel J. Culnen - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         

               Frank Agostino, for petitioner.                                        
               Steven W. Ianacone, for respondent.                                    


                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               HALPERN, Judge:  These consolidated cases involve the                  
          following determinations by respondent of deficiencies in,                  
          additions to, and penalties on petitioner's Federal income tax:             
                                Additions to Tax & Penalties                          
          Year  Deficiency  Sec. 6651(a)(1)   Sec. 6661   Sec. 6662   Sec. 6663       
          1987   $271,885       $48,616 $67,971        --          --                 
          1989    217,204        42,824      --        --   $162,903                  
          1990    381,883        88,399      --   $75,524        --                   
               Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to              
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and             
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
               After concessions, the issues for decision are:  (1) Whether           
          petitioner had sufficient basis with respect to an S corporation            
          for his taxable (calendar) years 1987, 1989, and 1990 to permit             
          him to deduct his pro rata share of the corporation’s ordinary              
          losses for those years in the amounts of $388,106, $651,357, and            
          $213,732, respectively; and (2) whether (A) the corporation                 
          suffered a section 1231 loss from the disposition of property in            
          1990 and (B) petitioner had sufficient basis to permit him to               
          deduct his pro rata share, $1,759,987, of that loss.                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011