Daniel J. Culnen - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         

          Wedgewood suffered the $1,759,987 loss.  We must determine both             
          his basis and whether Wedgewood suffered any loss.6                         
               Petitioner bears the burden of proof.  See Rule 142(a).                
          II.  Petitioner’s Basis With Respect to Wedgewood                           
               A.  Principal Statutory Provisions                                     
               Section 1366(a)(1) provides that a shareholder of an                   
          S corporation shall take into account his pro rata share of the S           
          corporation’s items of income, loss, deduction, or credit for the           
          S corporation’s taxable year ending in the shareholder’s taxable            
          year.  Section 1366(d), however, imposes a limit on the amount of           
          such losses and deductions (without distinction, losses) that a             
          shareholder may take into account for any taxable year.  He may             
          not take into account an aggregate amount of such losses                    
          exceeding the sum of (1) his adjusted basis in the stock of the S           
          corporation and (2) his adjusted basis in any indebtedness of the           
          S corporation to the shareholder (collectively, his S corporation           
          investment).  See sec. 1366(d)(1).  Any losses so disallowed may            
          be carried forward indefinitely.  See sec. 1366(d)(2).                      




               6    In the statutory notice of deficiency, respondent sets            
          forth numerous grounds for disallowing the $1,759,987 loss.  On             
          brief, respondent’s principal argument (other than that                     
          petitioner lacks sufficient adjusted basis in his investment in             
          Wedgewood) is that petitioner has failed to show that Wedgewood             
          realized any loss.  We assume that respondent has conceded any              
          other grounds.                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011