- 33 - The record, however, reflects that Gabriel did not contribute all of his income toward the support of his family. Gabriel testified that he maintained his personal checking account primarily to cover personal expenses. Gabriel failed to produce bank records for his personal checking account for approximately 13 weeks in 1995. The records he did produce indicate that deposits into the account totaled $6,017.07. Gabriel testified that he recognized deposits into the account as deposits of paychecks and money. Nothing in the record indicates that Gabriel received funds from others to deposit into this account. Thus, no more than $14,613.93 of the deposits into the household checking account in 1995 could be attributable to Gabriel.16 Gabriel identified only $4,919.31 of the deposits into the household account as his paychecks or otherwise attributable to him. But even if Gabriel had spent $14,613.93 on the support of the Mahmoud Daya family in 1995, he still contributed $39,206.5017 less than the money potentially available for the support of the family from Mahmoud, Fuad, and Morhaf. 16 Although Gabriel held legal title to the funds in the household account, we find that Mahmoud, Fuad, and Morhaf’s contributions to the account were not intended as gifts to Gabriel but that Gabriel was entrusted with the funds to meet the expenses of the Mahmoud Daya family. See supra pp. 30-31. Thus, the funds should not be credited to Gabriel for purposes of determining his contributions to the support of Mahmoud. 17 This amount represents Mahmoud’s SSI of $6,672, Mahmoud’s checks from Fuad totaling $17,500, checks totaling $5,308.43 drawn by Mahmoud on Fuad’s account, $3,000 drawn on the home equity line of credit, and Morhaf’s net wages of $21,340, which totals $53,820.43 minus Gabriel’s $14,613.93.Page: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011