Robert T. and Mary F. Gow - Page 21




                                        - 21 -                                          
               A.  Valuation by Petitioners’ Expert                                     
               Petitioners’ expert, Peter Gampel (Mr. Gampel), is the                   
          director of the Florida and Caribbean valuation services group of             
          Arthur Andersen & Co.  In determining the value of the shares of              
          WVI stock awarded to Dr. Gow (800 shares on February 16, 1989, and            
          400 shares on February 15, 1990), Mr. Gampel first valued WVI’s               
          one-third interest in Powhatan Associates, and then adjusted the              
          book values of WVI’s assets to their fair market values to                    
          determine the equity value of WVI as of the applicable valuation              
          date.  Next, Mr. Gampel applied discounts to the shares of stock              
          awarded to Dr. Gow to reflect lack of control and lack of                     
          marketability.  Mr. Gampel ultimately arrived at a value of                   
          $685,000 for the 800 shares of WVI stock awarded to Dr. Gow on                
          February 16, 1989, and $299,000 for the 400 shares awarded to Dr.             
          Gow on February 15, 1990.                                                     
               In valuing WVI’s interest in Powhatan Associates, Mr. Gampel             
          first determined the aggregate value of Powhatan Associates as of             
          February 16, 1989, and February 15, 1990, and in doing so he used             
          the income approach, adopting the discounted cash-flow method.  The           
          discounted cash-flow method is based upon the premise that a                  
          business is worth the present value of all future benefits it will            
          produce for its owner(s), with each expected future benefit                   
          discounted at a rate that reflects the risk that those benefits               
          will not be realized.  The discount rate selected is generally                






Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011