Robert T. and Mary F. Gow - Page 35




                                        - 35 -                                          
          marketability at both the Powhatan Associates and WVI levels.  The            
          discounts they used were as follows:                                          
                             At Powhatan Associates Level                               
                                              1989            1990                      
               Lack of control                 5%             5%                        
               Lack of marketability          10              10                        
                                     At WVI Level                                       
                                              1989            1990                      
               Lack of control                20%             50%                       
               Lack of marketability          10              10                        
          In contrast to these discounts, Mr. Gampel used the following                 
          discounts:                                                                    
                             At Powhatan Associates Level                               
                                              1989            1990                      
               Lack of control                15%             15%                       
               Lack of marketability          30              30                        
                                     At WVI Level                                       
                                              1989            1990                      
               Lack of control                20%             30%                       
               Lack of marketability          30              30                        
               We have duly considered and studied the factors and reasoning            
          used by the experts in determining their respective discount                  
          amounts.  In this regard, we found Mr. Gampel’s reasoning to be               
          well founded and more persuasive than that of Ms. Maiden and Ms.              
          Kalmar.  Mr. Gampel used empirical studies and factors (stated                
          supra pp. 24-26) that we believe appropriate in formulating his               






Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011