Douglas L. Hadsell - Page 11




                                         - 11 -                                          

          his receipts by tax year, activity, and type of deduction                      
          claimed.  Petitioner promised to cooperate with the examination                
          “100 percent”.  The Court then ordered that the record be held                 
          open for 60 days to allow an examination of petitioner’s                       
          receipts.                                                                      
               On March 3, 1998, one of respondent’s revenue agents                      
          contacted petitioner by phone and explained to petitioner how to               
          organize his receipts in order to facilitate the examination.  On              
          March 5, 1998, the agent visited petitioner and attempted to                   
          examine his receipts for the years at issue.                                   
               The agent found that petitioner had failed to organize his                
          receipts in any manner and was totally unprepared for the                      
          examination.  The agent explained to petitioner that he was                    
          acting pursuant to a deadline set by the Court and suggested that              
          they reschedule the examination so that petitioner could properly              
          prepare.  Petitioner declined to meet with the agent again and                 
          told the agent that he would be unable to organize the receipts                
          before the expiration of the Tax Court deadline because he was                 
          appealing his criminal conviction and needed all of his time to                
          work on the appeal.                                                            
               The agent decided to give petitioner time to reconsider his               
          decision and scheduled another call with petitioner for March 11,              
          1998.  When the agent phoned on that date, however, petitioner                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011