Douglas L. Hadsell - Page 15




                                         - 15 -                                          

          status for the 1990 taxable year.  Respondent is sustained on                  
          this issue.                                                                    
          2.  Whether Petitioner Is Entitled to Deductions for Expenses                  
          Incurred While Working as a Dockhand on a Commercial Fishing Boat              
               Pursuant to Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir.                   
          1930), we are permitted to estimate expenses when we are                       
          convinced from the record that the taxpayer has incurred such                  
          expenses.  In Hadsell I, we found that petitioner was entitled to              
          deduct $750 as business expenses attributable to his fishing                   
          activity for each year of the years at issue.                                  
               At trial on January 30, 1998, petitioner failed to adduce                 
          any additional evidence substantiating his claimed expenses.                   
          Therefore, we do not change our previous finding that petitioner               
          is entitled to deduct $750 as business expenses attributable to                
          his fishing activity for each year of the years at issue.                      
          3.  Deductions Related to Rental Property                                      
               Petitioner contends that he is entitled to deduct expenses                
          with respect to rental real property he purchased in 1989 and                  
          also claim a casualty loss for items he had stored on the rental               
          property which were sold by the tenants.                                       
               In Hadsell I, we found that petitioner’s testimony                        
          concerning his claimed expenses and casualty losses was vague and              
          unsupported and that we had no basis to allow petitioner to claim              
          either a rental property expense or casualty loss for the years                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011