Estate of Judith U. Harrison - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          section 7520 of the Internal Revenue Code”, Notice 89-24, 1989-1            
          C.B. 660, during the period between the enactment of section 7520           
          and the promulgation of final regulations and tables.                       
          III.  Case Law                                                              
               The existing case law as of April 1, 1994, although                    
          involving valuation dates prior to section 7520’s enactment,                
          specifically dealt with the issue of valuing interests                      
          transferred in simultaneous death situations for purposes of the            
          section 2013 credit.  See Estate of Carter v. United States, 921            
          F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1991); Estate of Lion v. Commissioner, 438 F.2d           
          56 (4th Cir. 1971), affg. 52 T.C. 601 (1969); Estate of Marks v.            
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 720 (1990); Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v.              
          United States, 292 F. Supp. 48 (W.D. Mich. 1968), revd. on other            
          grounds 430 F.2d 392 (6th Cir. 1970).                                       
               As early as 1968, a U.S. District Court had ruled in Old               
          Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, supra at 53-55, that a              
          life estate had no value for tax credit purposes where, despite a           
          testamentary provision creating a presumption of survival, the              
          decedents had apparently died together in a plane crash.  This              
          Court then reached the same conclusion in Estate of Lion v.                 
          Commissioner, 52 T.C. at 606-607, and the Court of Appeals for              
          the Fourth Circuit affirmed, Estate of Lion v. Commissioner, 438            
          F.2d at 61-62.  Each of these decisions reiterated that value for           
          tax purposes is based upon the amount that a hypothetical willing           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011