Estate of Judith U. Harrison - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
               As previously indicated, section 20.7520-4(a), Estate Tax              
          Regs., states that, if the relevant valuation date is after April           
          30, 1989, and before June 10, 1994, executors may rely on Notice            
          89-24, 1989-1 C.B. 660, and Notice 89-60, 1989-1 C.B. 700, in               
          valuing transferred interests.  However, in attempting to                   
          analogize their use of these Notices to the reliance on Rev. Rul.           
          80-80, 1980-1 C.B. 194, addressed in Estate of McLendon v.                  
          Commissioner, supra, the estates have failed to recognize a                 
          critical distinction.  Neither the regulation nor the referenced            
          Notices purport to deal with the substantive question of whether            
          actuarial tables are properly applied in the first instance.  In            
          fact, Notice 89-24, 1989-1 C.B. 660, recites only that                      
          “Generally, under section 7520, the value of an annuity, interest           
          for life or for a term of years, or remainder or reversionary               
          interest is determined under new tables that are to be prescribed           
          by the Secretary.”  The regulation and Notices merely authorize             
          executors to utilize a particular set of figures and formulas,              
          different from those promulgated in the final regulations, in               
          performing the actuarial computation.  They do not provide any              
          standards regarding whether use of actuarial tables is the                  
          appropriate valuation methodology.  Other administrative and                
          judicial rulings in place at the time the Notices were issued               
          dealt with this question, and the estates are not entitled to               
          ignore the principles established therein.                                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011