Ingram Industries, Inc. & Subsidiaries - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          C.  Towboat Engines and Petitioners’ Maintenance Procedures                 
               Most of the towboats in petitioners’ fleet are equipped with           
          two turbocharged, “V-type,” two-cycle, diesel-powered engines.              
          During the years in issue, between two-thirds and three-quarters            
          of the towboats in petitioners’ fleet possessed similar engines             
          to the representative boats’ engines.3  The horsepower produced             
          by two engines ranges from 5,000 to 5,600 horsepower, depending             
          on the rotations per minute at which the engines are set to                 
          operate.  Assuming proper maintenance, towboat’s engines can                
          continue operating safely, efficiently and profitably as part of            
          a towboat’s main propulsion system for up to 40 years.                      
               The procedures in controversy involve petitioners’ cleaning            
          and inspecting of engines to determine which of their parts are             
          within acceptable operating tolerances and can be reused and                
          which (if any) of these parts need to be reconditioned back to              
          acceptable operating tolerances or replaced with appropriate                
          replacements.4                                                              




               3 For purposes of this case, the parties have agreed that              
          the Electro-motive Division (EMD) No. 16-645-E5 engine,                     
          manufactured by General Motors, will be the representative                  
          engine.                                                                     
               4 As part of the controversy over whether the expenditures             
          involved are currently deductible or must be capitalized,                   
          respondent refers to these procedures as an “engine overhaul” and           
          petitioners refer to these procedures as “center-section engine             
          maintenance”.                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011