Laurence L. and Patricia Jacobs - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          had all the Schedules K-1 for tax year 1983 but was never able to           
          procure all of the Schedules K-1 for 1984.6                                 
               During the period April 1, 1985, through August 1987, there            
          was never a time when no work was being done on the TLP file.               
          Agent McBrien never received any complaints from any of the                 
          limited partners or TLP's representatives regarding the speed of            
          the examination.  At the conclusion of his examination, Agent               
          McBrien determined that all R&D losses for tax years 1983 and               
          1984 should be disallowed, but that no penalties should be                  
          determined.  With an attached cover letter dated March 24, 1987,            
          Agent McBrien sent Mr. Reising a tentative position paper                   
          proposing to disallow the R&D expenses claimed for 1983.  Agent             
          McBrien then contacted the tax matters partner and Mr. Reising              
          about setting a time for a closing conference.  The date of the             
          closing conference is unknown.  By August or September 1987,                
          Agent McBrien finished his examination of TLP.  Complete                    
          agreement was not reached and the case was ultimately sent to               
          Appeals to resolve the remaining disputed issues.                           






          6    Obtaining the 1984 Schedules K-1 was necessary because the             
          TLP audit involved a series of transactions straddling the 1983             
          and 1984 taxable years.  It was not prudent to conduct a separate           
          audit for each of those 2 taxable years because the series of               
          transactions was part of the larger issue of whether the R&D                
          expenses were deductible.                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011