Laurence L. and Patricia Jacobs - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
          September 1987 Through November 17, 1991                                    
               Sometime after his last meeting with TLP's representatives,            
          during August 1987, but before April 1989, Agent McBrien                    
          forwarded the TLP file to respondent's Quality Review branch to             
          be reviewed for compliance with internal procedures.  The exact             
          date, or even the approximate date, that Quality Review received            
          the TLP file is unknown.                                                    
               Because TLP is governed by the Tax Equity and Fiscal                   
          Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), Pub. L. 97-248, 96 Stat. 324,           
          Quality Review had to perform special compliance checks.  Michael           
          Lester was assigned to the Quality Review branch during 1989.  As           
          a TEFRA coordinator, Agent Lester was responsible for reviewing             
          TEFRA cases to make sure that the administrative steps had been             
          followed properly.  He was also responsible for preparing the               
          appropriate 60-day or 150-day letter.  Agent Lester did not                 
          remember the TLP case, nor did he recall when his unit received             
          the case.  Agent Lester remembered keeping current with his                 
          caseload and did not recall a backlog of cases in Quality Review            
          when he was there.                                                          
               During April 1989, Quality Review returned the TLP case to             
          Agent McBrien's examination group because the case file did not             
          have any of the Schedules K-1 needed for processing.  Quality               
          Review also asked Agent McBrien to look into other substantive              
          issues and to reexamine whether it was appropriate to impose                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011