Anthony W. Jorgenson and Florence A. Jorgenson - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
               D.  The Expectation That Assets May Appreciate in Value                
               An expectation that assets may appreciate in value may also            
          be an indication of the taxpayer’s motive with respect to such              
          activity.  See sec. 1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioners            
          contend that the appreciation in the value of their four                    
          properties more than offsets petitioners’ historical losses.  Mr.           
          Jorgenson testified that the appreciation on the four properties            
          exceeded the historical losses and that the Colorado ranch could            
          be sold for more than the amount of the historical losses.  Mr.             
          Jorgenson, however, failed to explain to the Court how he knows             
          his claims to be true.  We note with regard to the Colorado                 
          ranch, for example, petitioners purchased land in 1983 for $458             
          an acre ($550,000 � 1,200 acres), while in 1992, they purchased             
          adjoining land for $158 an acre ($101,000 � 640 acres).  Because            
          no appraisals of the four properties were presented to the Court,           
          we do not accept petitioners’ uncorroborated claims.                        
          Accordingly, this factor does not support petitioners’                      
          assertions.                                                                 
               E.  The Success of the Taxpayer in Carrying on Other                   
          Similar or Dissimilar Activities                                            
               A profit motive may be indicated by the “fact that a                   
          taxpayer has engaged in similar activities in the past and                  
          converted them from unprofitable to profitable enterprises”.                
          Sec. 1.183-2(b)(5), Income Tax Regs.  Petitioners argue that they           
          profitably operated cattle operations on their parents’ ranches             
          and that they have successfully operated their medical practices.           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011