- 17 - We do not equate petitioners’ childhood experiences of caring for a limited amount of cattle with the responsibility associated with running an entire ranching and farming operation. Further, petitioners’ experiences in the medical field do not meaningfully translate into their ranching and farming operations. See Wesinger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-372; Wilkinson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-39. Accordingly, this factor also does not support petitioners’ position. F. The Activity’s History of Income or Losses and Amount of Occasional Profits (If Any) A record of substantial losses over several years may be indicative of the absence of a profit motive. See Golanty v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 411, 426 (1979), affd. without opinion 647 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1981). Petitioners have incurred losses throughout their ownership of the four properties, with $1,284,349 being incurred between 1986 and 1994. Petitioners have never earned any profits from the ranching and farming activities. Petitioners argue that they incurred losses from normal startup costs and from unusual market and economic conditions. Further, petitioners contend that part of their losses can also be explained by dramatic weather conditions that affected their Colorado ranch. We are unpersuaded. Although the Court recognizes that pecan operations do not immediately become profitable, petitioners purchased the Kerrville ranch in 1993, but they didPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011