Michele D. Livingston - Page 5




                                         - 5 -                                          
          Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA), Pub. L. 105-206, sec.             
          3201(a), (e)(1), 112 Stat. 734.  On August 3 and 18, 1998,                    
          petitioner filed administrative elections for relief from joint               
          liability pursuant to section 6015(b) and (c), respectively.  The             
          Court suspended the briefing schedule to provide respondent an                
          opportunity to respond to petitioner’s administrative elections.              
               On January 13, 1999, respondent notified petitioner that she             
          is entitled to relief from joint liability pursuant to section                
          6015(c) and mailed her a proposed decision representing a                     
          concession that she has no liability for any amount of the                    
          deficiency in dispute.  Respondent made no determination whether              
          petitioner qualified for relief under section 6015(b).                        
               On January 25, 1999, petitioner advised the Court that she               
          agreed with respondent’s concession of the entire deficiency                  
          against her pursuant to section 6015(c) but that she would not                
          agree to respondent’s proposed decision unless respondent also                
          responded to her election under section 6015(b).                              
               With leave of the Court, on March 17, 1999, petitioner filed             
          an amendment to petition, in which she requested the Court to                 
          require respondent to make a determination as to her eligibility              
          for relief from joint liability under former section 6013(e) and              
          section 6015(b).  On March 26, 1999, respondent filed an answer               
          to petitioner’s amendment to petition.  The Court then directed               
          the parties to file opening and answering briefs.                             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011