- 7 - or penalty under the Internal Revenue Code. An award of reasonable administrative or litigation costs may be made where the taxpayer is the prevailing party and did not unreasonably protract the administrative or judicial proceedings. See sec. 7430(a) and (b)(3). Litigation costs may be awarded only if the taxpayer exhausted available administrative remedies. See sec. 7430(b)(1). To be a prevailing party, a taxpayer must: (1) Substantially prevail with respect to either the amount in controversy or the most significant issue or set of issues presented, and (2) meet certain net worth requirements. See sec. 7430(c)(4)(A)(i) and (ii). Respondent concedes that petitioner substantially prevailed and meets the net worth requirements. Respondent argues, however, that petitioner is not the prevailing party because respondent was substantially justified in maintaining his position in the administrative and judicial proceedings. Respondent also argues that petitioner did not exhaust all administrative remedies, that petitioner unreasonably protracted the proceedings, and that the fees requested are unreasonable. As a general rule, the taxpayer in an administrative or court proceeding is not treated as the prevailing party if respondent establishes that the position of the United States was substantially justified. See sec. 7430(c)(4)(B)(i). Pursuant toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011