Microsoft Corporation - Page 37




                                       - 37 -                                         
         this case.  By applying that standard, we hold that the temporary            
         regulation is valid.  Our holding is based upon the following.               
              (1)  The temporary regulation harmonizes8 with the purpose of           
         the statute by specifically excluding intangibles from the                   
         definition of export property. The purpose of the DISC/FSC                   
         provisions was to increase U.S. exports and U.S. jobs by excluding           
         from Federal income tax certain property sold by an FSC or a DISC            
         that was produced, manufactured, or created in the United States.            
         See Staff of Joint Comm. on Taxation, General Explanation of the Tax         
         Reform Act of 1976, at 290-291 (J. Comm. Print 1976).  The temporary         
         regulation allows computer software to be entitled to this                   
         exclusion, as long as the software is not accompanied by a right to          
         reproduce abroad.                                                            
              On the other hand, exporting a computer software master with a          
         right to reproduce abroad sends adaptation, localization, and                
         manufacturing jobs offshore.  Thus, granting FSC benefits to                 
         copyrighted computer software with the right to reproduce abroad             
         would undermine the basic policy of withholding tax incentives from          
         export transactions that create manufacturing or production jobs             
         overseas.                                                                    




               8    Petitioner acknowledges that, in the event we hold that           
          the parenthetical is restricted to motion pictures and sound                
          recordings (as we have), respondent’s construction of the                   
          temporary regulation harmonizes with the statute’s plain meaning.           






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011