Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company and Subsidiaries - Page 30




                                                -30-                                                   
            appropriate, to project the ultimate losses for that year.  In                             
            this respect, Streff’s approach is similar to methods used by                              
            petitioner’s appointed actuaries.                                                          
                  Streff then reduced the ultimate losses by the amounts                               
            already paid for each year to determine the projected loss                                 
            reserve.  He did this for both incurred losses and paid losses.                            
            Streff equally weighted the projected losses using incurred loss                           
            development and paid loss development to arrive at his selected                            
            loss reserve for each of the years in issue.                                               
                  Streff separately calculated the amount to be reserved for                           
            allocated loss expenses.  He reviewed the historical                                       
            relationship between paid losses and paid loss expenses to                                 
            determine a ratio for each year in which claims remained open.                             
            Streff then applied this ratio to his projected unpaid losses to                           
            determine the amount of projected allocated loss expenses.                                 
            Streff also calculated a reserve for unallocated loss expenses.                            
            Unlike Hayne, Streff provided a “most likely estimate” of                                  
            petitioner's net loss reserve for each of the years in issue as                            
            follows:                                                                                   
                           Year                    Amount                                              
                           1993         $8,240,000                                                     
                           1994          7,273,000                                                     
                           1995          6,212,000                                                     










Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011