Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company and Subsidiaries - Page 37




                                                -37-                                                   
                  Similarly, for petitioner’s 1994 and 1995 years, Teufel                              
            provided a “selected point estimate” that was significantly                                
            lower than petitioner’s carried net reserves.  For each of these                           
            years, Teufel also provided a recommended range.  Relative to                              
            the recommended range of the taxpayer’s actuary in Utah Medical,                           
            Teufel’s recommended ranges are very large.26  The evidence in                             
            the record is insufficient for us to evaluate adequately whether                           
            Teufel’s recommended ranges are so large as to be unreasonable,                            
            or whether every point in each recommended range would satisfy                             
            the requirement that the determination of unpaid losses                                    


                  25(...continued)                                                                     
            Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-545.                                                         
                  At trial, respondent raised a hearsay objection to the                               
            admission into evidence of the actuaries’ opinions and reports.                            
            The Court overruled the objection but invited respondent to renew                          
            his objection on brief.  Respondent has not done so.  We conclude                          
            that respondent has abandoned his objection.  In any event,                                
            respondent’s objection is without merit, as petitioner presented                           
            adequate foundation testimony to qualify the actuarial opinions                            
            and reports as business records.  See Fed. R. Evid. 803(6).                                
            Furthermore, respondent’s expert witness stated that he relied                             
            upon the actuarial reports as one of four primary sources of                               
            information, from which we conclude that respondent’s own expert                           
            deemed the information therein to be trustworthy.                                          
                  26 In Utah Med. Ins. Association v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                         
            1998-458, we accepted the reserves carried by the taxpayer even                            
            though they were near the upper limit of the actuary's range.  We                          
            characterized the actuary's range as large, but not so large as                            
            to be unreasonable.  See id.  The upper limit of the actuary's                             
            range in Utah Medical was approximately 26 percent above the                               
            lower limit of the range for each year in issue.  In the instant                           
            case, by contrast, for 1994 the upper limit of Teufel’s                                    
            recommended range was approximately 70 percent higher than the                             
            lower limit, and for 1995 the upper limit was approximately 120                            
            percent higher than the lower limit.                                                       




Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011