Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company and Subsidiaries - Page 43




                                                -43-                                                   
            incurred” within the meaning of section 832(b)(5), represent a                             
            “fair and reasonable estimate of the amount the company will be                            
            required to pay.”  Sec. 1.832-4(b), Income Tax Regs.                                       
                  B.  Determination of Fair and Reasonable Unpaid Losses                               
            for 1993                                                                                   
                  The analysis of respondent’s expert, Streff, was in key                              
            respects similar to that of petitioner's appointed actuaries.                              
            He testified that he agreed with the actuaries’ data and                                   
            techniques and disagreed only with their assumptions.                                      
                  For taxable year 1993, we find Streff’s analysis and                                 
            conclusions to be credible.  We accept as fair and reasonable                              
            his $8,240,000 estimate of petitioner’s net unpaid losses as of                            
            yearend 1993.  We note that this estimate exceeds Witcraft’s                               
            best net reserve estimate of $7,800,000, as well as the                                    
            $7,134,000 net reserve estimate determined in respondent’s                                 
            notice of deficiency.30                                                                    

                  30 Streff’s 1993 estimate of petitioner’s net unpaid loss                            
            reserve is lower than petitioner’s 1993 net carried case reserve                           
            of $8,478,000.  At first blush, this result may seem anomalous,                            
            given respondent’s statement on brief that petitioner’s case                               
            reserves are “at least facially” in compliance with the                                    
            regulatory requirement that unpaid losses be calculated “based on                          
            the facts of each case.”  Sec. 1.832-4(b), Income Tax Regs.  We                            
            do not interpret respondent’s statement on brief as a concession,                          
            however, that petitioner’s net case reserves reflect a fair and                            
            reasonable estimate of petitioner’s unpaid losses.  Respondent’s                           
            statement on brief appears to refer to petitioner’s estimate of                            
            its gross unpaid losses and not to address possible effects of                             
            proceeds recoverable through petitioner’s reinsurance                                      
            arrangements, which proceeds are taken into account in computing                           
            losses incurred, within the meaning of sec. 832.  See sec.                                 
            832(b)(5)(A)(iii).  In this regard, we note that for each year in                          
                                                                         (continued...)                




Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011