The Nis Family Trust - Page 2




                                                - 2 -                                                  
                  only meritless tax-protester arguments.  Ps, therefore,                              
                  have conceded those adjustments and, with respect to                                 
                  the deficiencies in tax determined by R, entry of                                    
                  judgment on the pleadings is appropriate.  Sec. 7491,                                
                  I.R.C., does not add to the burden of respondent as the                              
                  movant for judgment on the pleadings in these cases.  R                              
                  has shown that partial summary judgment is appropriate                               
                  for the accuracy-related penalties determined by R.  Ps                              
                  have abandoned their return positions, relying,                                      
                  instead, on a strategy of noncooperation and delay,                                  
                  undertaken behind a smokescreen of frivolous tax-                                    
                  protester arguments. S, Ps’ attorney, has, in bad                                    
                  faith, aided Ps in that strategy by making additional                                
                  meritless tax-protester arguments, making meritless                                  
                  motions and responses to motions, and abusing the                                    
                  Court’s subpoena power.  Neither Ps or S have shown                                  
                  that the orders to show cause should not be made                                     
                  absolute.                                                                            
                        1.  Held:  With respect to the deficiencies in tax                             
                  determined by respondent, judgment will be entered on                                
                  the pleadings.  Rule 120(a), Tax Court Rules of                                      
                  Practice and Procedure.                                                              
                        2.  Held, further, sec. 7491, I.R.C., does not add                             
                  to movant’s burden for judgment on the pleadings with                                
                  respect to such deficiencies in tax.                                                 
                        3.  Held, further, with respect to the sec. 6662,                              
                  I.R.C., accuracy-related penalties, partial summary                                  
                  judgment will be granted for R.  Rule 121(a), Tax Court                              
                  Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                                     
                        4.  Held, further, in each case, P (or Ps) will be                             
                  required to pay penalties ($25,000 in docket No. 9822-                               
                  99; $500 in docket No. 9820-99 and $5,000 in docket No.                              
                  9821-99) on account of instituting and maintaining                                   
                  these proceedings primarily for delay and taking                                     
                  frivolous and groundless positions.  Sec. 6673(a)(1),                                
                  I.R.C.                                                                               
                        5.  Held, further, S will be required to pay                                   
                  personally $10,643.75 for R’s excess attorney’s fees                                 
                  reasonably incurred by R on account of S’s bad faith                                 
                  course of conduct in which she unreasonably and                                      
                  vexatiously multiplied the proceedings.  Sec.                                        
                  6673(a)(2), I.R.C.                                                                   











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011