Philip A. Sellers - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
               The four 1990 advances were each evidenced by promissory               
          notes,11 as was the December 2, 1993, advance of $10,483.  All              
          the notes were unsecured.  Apart from the $5,000 repayment made             
          in late 1993, which was not allocated specifically to any of the            
          notes, there were no repayments.  When petitioner made the                  
          advances, either he singly, or else he and Philip together, owned           
          all the interest in Gandy’s, either directly or through their               
          wholly owned corporations PASEL or Merchant Capital, which was              
          also underwriter of the Gandy’s bonds.12  Throughout this period,           
          Philip was president of Gandy’s.  Where a transaction involves a            
          closely held corporation, the form and labels used may signify              
          little, because the parties can mold the transaction to their               
          will.  See Anchor Natl. Life Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C.              
          382, 407 (1989).  Accordingly, we assign little weight to the               
          labeling of certain of the advances as notes.                               
               2.  The Presence or Absence of a Fixed Maturity Date                   
               The presence of a fixed maturity date is indicative of debt            
          but is not dispositive.  See American Offshore, Inc. v.                     



               11 One of these notes indicates on its face that it was made           
          some 6 months after petitioner had wired the principal amount to            
          Gandy’s, suggesting the absence of a “businesslike, arm’s length            
          transaction.”  Estate of Mixon v. United States, 464 F.2d 394,              
          403 (5th Cir. 1972).                                                        
               12 The record is unclear about the exact configuration over            
          time of ownership interests in Gandy’s among petitioner, Philip,            
          and their corporations.  Petitioners state in their reply brief             
          that petitioner “eventually held all the [Gandy’s] stock”.                  





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011