Diana T. Visco - Page 4




                                        - 4 -                                         

          petitioner $111,708.44.  The $111,708.44 amount was computed as             
          follows:                                                                    
               1989-90 salary                      1$55,634.51                        
               1990-91 salary                       252,349.93                        
               Additional interest                     3524.58                        
               Reimbursement for benefits            43,195.84                        
          Total                             5111,704.86                               
               1This amount consists of a base salary of $50,500 less interim earnings of
          $871.15, plus interest to Feb. 25, 1991, of $6,005.66.                      
               2This amount consists of a base salary of $54,300 less interim earnings of
          $4,968, plus interest to Feb. 25, 1992, of $3,017.93.                       
               3There is a $12,794.52 difference between the $107,984.44 ($55,634.51 +
          52,349.93) in backpay and interest on backpay that the district ultimately paid
          petitioner and the $95,189.92 in backpay and interest on backpay that the district
          offered her on Feb. 25, 1992.  The $524.58 in additional interest represents 6
          percent interest on $12,794.52.                                             
               4This amount constitutes reimbursement for medical and dental benefits that
          petitioner did not receive while terminated.                                
               5There is a small difference of $3.58.                                 
               The district issued two checks to petitioner, each dated               
          December 21, 1992, totaling $59,079.78.  These checks represented           
          backpay and interest on backpay of $108,509.02 after payroll                
          deductions.3  The district also issued a check to petitioner                
          dated December 21, 1992, in the amount of $3,195.84 as                      
          reimbursement for benefits petitioner had not received.  A                  
          courier presented the checks to petitioner on December 28, 1992.4           



               3A portion of the payroll deductions consisted of $31,042.86           
          in Federal income taxes.                                                    
               4However, the record is not clear whether petitioner also              
          received the third check for $3,195.84 on Dec. 28, 1992.  It is             
          irrelevant to our inquiry since the check for $3,195.84 was not             
          included in the Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, for 1992 and is           
          not included in respondent’s determination of unreported income.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011