Diana T. Visco - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

               inaccurately identified as retirement[8] salary.                       
               Taxpayer has not filed any application for retirement                  
               allowance.  Moreover, these checks serve to validate a                 
               grossly inaccurate retirement fund.  Consequently, the                 
               taxpayer does not know how to complete tax filing for                  
               the 1992 tax year and kindly requests a thorough                       
               investigation into this matter. * * *                                  
               The substitute Form W-2 was accompanied by a letter                    
          requesting a criminal investigation into the matter.  In the                
          letter, petitioner stated she wished to complete her 1992 Federal           
          tax return in a manner that would allow her to preserve her legal           
          rights.                                                                     
               On August 13, 1993, petitioner filed a Form 2688,                      
          “Application for Additional Extension of Time to File U.S.                  
          Individual Income Tax Return”.  Petitioner provided the following           
          explanation for her request:                                                
               I requested a criminal investigation of monies reported                
               on my 1992 W-2.  I have not received any information                   
               about the information given on Form 4852 dated June 17,                
               1993 and [sic] am uncertain about how to file my 1992                  
               tax return.                                                            
               On October 4, 1993, the Commonwealth Court ordered the                 
          district to pay the sum of $62,275.629 into the Commonwealth                


               8Neither of the paychecks nor the accompanying payment stubs           
          identified the payment as retirement salary.  The only references           
          to retirement salary were explanatory notes on the payment stubs            
          indicating that the payroll deductions taken from petitioner’s              
          pay for retirement benefits are based on her retirement salary.             
               9The difference between the $111,708.44 that the                       
          Commonwealth Court ordered the district to pay petitioner on Dec.           
          3, 1992, and the $62,275.62 that the Commonwealth Court ordered             
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011