- 16 - report this income, and the resulting underpayments for 1991 and 1992, were due to the fraud of each petitioner for each year. For 1993, petitioners had an underpayment of tax required to be shown on their tax return, and some part of this underpayment was due to petitioners’ negligence. OPINION I. General Summary The CIPAA Casino paid $10 or $12 per hour worked to each petitioner in 1991, 1992, and 1993. As to this hourly compensation, the CIPAA Casino did not send Forms W-2 to petitioners for 1991 and 1992, but did for 1993. Petitioners did not report any of this income on their 1991 (almost $10,000) and 1992 (about $15,000) tax returns; they reported the full W-2 amounts on their 1993 tax return. The CIPAA Casino gathered, apportioned, and periodically paid to their employees the tips that patrons paid. Petitioners did not report any of this tip income on their 1991 tax return; they reported $1,230 of this income (Rogelio--$750, Zenaida-- $480) on their 1992 tax return. We hold that respondent proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) petitioners failed to report hourly compensation that they received in 1991 and 1992, (2) petitioners failed to report tip income that they received in 1991, (3) these omissions led to underpayments of tax for 1991 and 1992, and (4)Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011