Rogelio R. Balot and Zenaida V. Balot - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          because (1) petitioners did not act with the requisite fraudulent           
          intent, and (2) reasonable cause supported their actions.                   
               We agree with respondent’s conclusions and most of                     
          respondent’s contentions.                                                   
               When respondent seeks to impose the addition to tax under              
          section 66635, respondent has the burden of proof.  To carry this           
          burden for a year, respondent must prove two elements, as                   
          follows:  (1) That petitioners have an underpayment of tax for              
          that year, and (2) that some part of that underpayment is due to            
          fraud.  See sec. 7454(a)6; Rule 142(b); see, e.g., Carter v.                


               5SEC. 6663.   IMPOSITION OF FRAUD PENALTY.                             
                    (a)  Imposition of Penalty.--If any part of any                   
               underpayment of tax required to be shown on a return is due            
               to fraud, there shall be added to the tax an amount equal to           
               75 percent of the portion of the underpayment which is                 
               attributable to fraud.                                                 
                    (b)  Determination of Portion Attributable to Fraud.--            
               If the Secretary establishes that any portion of an                    
               underpayment is attributable to fraud, the entire                      
               underpayment shall be treated as attributable to fraud,                
               except with respect to any portion of the underpayment which           
               the taxpayer establishes (by a preponderance of the                    
               evidence) is not attributable to fraud.                                
                    (c)  Special Rule for Joint Returns.--In the case of a            
               joint return, this section shall not apply with respect to a           
               spouse unless some part of the underpayment is due to the              
               fraud of such spouse.                                                  
               6SEC. 7454. BURDEN OF PROOF IN FRAUD, FOUNDATION                       
                         MANAGER, AND TRANSFEREE CASES.                               
                    (a)  Fraud.--In any proceeding involving the issue                
               whether the petitioner has been guilty of fraud with intent            
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011