Michael L. and Susan Barnard - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          discovered that he had underreported his income from those                  
          activities; petitioners had originally estimated the income from            
          these activities for Federal income tax purposes by way of rough            
          calculations.  When respondent notified petitioners that he would           
          be auditing their personal returns, Mr. Barnard notified                    
          respondent that petitioners had just amended (but not yet filed)            
          their 1987, 1988, and 1989 personal income tax returns to report            
          additional rental income.  Mr. Barnard gave those amended returns           
          to Revenue Agent Bruce Smith (Revenue Agent Smith) pursuant to              
          his request.  The 1987 amended return reported additional income            
          of $16,030 and $1,860 from Bridge Street and Lake Michigan                  
          Heights, respectively.  The 1988 amended return reported                    
          additional income from those respective rentals of $20,963 and              
          $1,850.  The 1989 amended return reported additional income of              
          $24,840 from Bridge Street and a reduction of income of $3,959              
          from Lake Michigan Heights.  Because respondent never processed             
          any of these amended returns, the deficiencies shown in the                 
          notice of deficiency include the underpayments reflected on those           
          returns.                                                                    
               On February 12, 1991, Revenue Agent Smith referred                     
          petitioners' 1987, 1988, and 1989 returns to respondent’s                   
          Criminal Investigation Division.  The assigned agent, Special               
          Agent Robert Keller, concluded that he could ascertain                      
          petitioners’ taxable income only through an indirect method of              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011