Michael L. and Susan Barnard - Page 15




                                       - 15 -                                         
          their personal income tax liability.  Second, respondent applied            
          the net worth calculation to each year only after respondent                
          audited Nanny’s 1988 taxable year and determined that some of               
          Nanny’s cash receipts had been commingled with petitioners’                 
          personal funds and that Nanny’s records did not allow for a                 
          proper accounting of the commingled funds.  The bare summaries              
          which petitioners maintained as to Nanny’s income did not allow             
          respondent to determine with any precision or certainty the                 
          amount of the commingled funds which were attributable to Nanny’s           
          but which Nanny’s no longer retained (i.e., were spent by                   
          petitioners on personal items).  Whereas Mr. Mason performed a              
          calculation under which he was assured as to the amount of any              
          loan between petitioners and Nanny’s on account of the commingled           
          funds, we do not have the same level of assurance in that                   
          calculation to hold respondent to it.  Third, respondent                    
          performed the net worth calculations only after analyzing                   
          petitioners’ lifestyle and determining that their lifestyle did             
          not appear to comport with their reported income.  In this                  
          regard, respondent had received the STRs which the Bank had                 
          issued as to petitioners reporting that they had entered into               
          various “suspicious” cash transactions.  Under the facts herein,            
          we conclude that respondent was entitled to use the net worth               
          method to compute petitioners’ income for each subject year.                








Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011