Michael L. and Susan Barnard - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
               Petitioners argue alternatively that respondent’s net worth            
          analysis was unreliable.  They assert that respondent failed to             
          determine accurately their net worth on December 31, 1986,                  
          because, they claim, respondent incorrectly determined that they            
          had no cash on hand on that date.  They also assert that                    
          respondent’s net worth analysis failed to reflect properly                  
          certain incidental items.                                                   
               We disagree with petitioners’ claim that respondent’s net              
          worth analysis is unreliable.  We have set forth that analysis in           
          our findings of fact.  On the basis of our review of it in light            
          of the record, we are unpersuaded that respondent’s calculation             
          as to petitioners’ cash on hand on December 31, 1986, is                    
          inaccurate.  The record contains no reliable evidence from which            
          we can conclude that petitioners, in their personal capacity, had           
          any cash on that date.5  Petitioners’ position as to their cash             
          on hand rests almost entirely on their trial testimony.  We find            
          that testimony unpersuasive in that it is uncorroborated,                   
          inconsistent, and self-serving.  See Roberts v. Commissioner,               
          T.C. Memo. 1987-182.  Nor can we conclude that respondent did not           
          properly take into account various other incidental items for               




               5 Petitioners focus on a $63,000 loan that petitioners                 
          received on Aug. 22, 1986, and assert that $21,000 of those                 
          proceeds was on hand on Dec. 31, 1986.  The record does not                 
          support this assertion.                                                     





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011