- 43 - schedule a meeting with petitioner and Ms. Brodsky, Ms. Martin attempted several times to reach Mr. Sutton by telephone and also sent him another letter. Mr. Sutton did not respond to those telephone calls or that letter. Sometime in December 1994, Ms. Martin received a power of attorney authorizing Elizabeth Schwiff (Ms. Schwiff) to represent petitioner and Ms. Brodsky with respect to respondent’s examina- tion of their joint returns for 1991 and 1992. Thereafter, Ms. Martin telephoned Ms. Schwiff. During that telephone call, Ms. Schwiff asked Ms. Martin to mail her copies of (1) all of the requests for documents that Ms. Martin had issued with respect to 1991 and 1992, (2) the bank statements that Ms. Martin had reviewed for those years regarding accounts that petitioner and/or Ms. Brodsky had maintained during those years, and (3) the 1991-1992 deposits analysis that Ms. Martin had prepared. Ms. Martin complied with Ms. Schwiff’s requests. Sometime after Ms. Martin mailed Ms. Schwiff the copies of all of the documents that Ms. Schwiff had requested, Ms. Schwiff informed Ms. Martin that petitioner and Ms. Brodsky intended to organize their records. Thereafter, Ms. Martin had no further contact with Ms. Schwiff. Sometime between the end of May 1995 and the beginning of July 1995, respondent received a power of attorney authorizing Mr. DiBernardo to represent petitioner and Ms. Brodsky with respect to respondent’s examination of their joint returns forPage: Previous 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011