- 10 - amount that may be due from the insurance company. The notice of deficiency contained the following explanation for disallowing the $122,400 adjustment: “It is determined that the estate took a $855,573 deduction for outstanding monies owed to the contractors. Since the insurance was to pay for the entire cost of rebuilding, the estate cannot deduct more than it returns as an asset.” In effect, respondent’s approach results in a net amount of $1,032,000 being included in the gross estate with respect to the partially completed residence. We disagree with the approach utilized by both parties. We do not question the legal principles relied upon by either party, but question their interpretation and application of those principles to the facts. We first review the legal principles. For Federal estate tax purposes, assets are includable in a decedent’s gross estate at fair market value determined at the date of death. See sec. 2031(a);5 sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs. Fair market value is “‘the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.’” United States v. Cartwright, 411 U.S. 546, 551 (1973) (quoting sec. 20.2031- 5 All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect as of the date of decedent’s death, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011